|
CATEGORY
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Summary/
reflection |
An excellent summary from which one can understand the main events, good insights, some personal ideas added.
|
Nice summary, main events mentioned, one or two personal thoughts. Yet, it is evident that the student has read the text.
|
The summary is very short, no personal insights. However the sentences written are to the point.
|
Gives only a couple of sentences of irrelevant information, not really about the chapters read.
|
Answering the questions
|
Student is able to give interesting information, well developed ideas and answers regarding the questions given, if needed is able to use the text to back himself/herself up.
|
Student has nice, original ideas while answering, however not all ideas are supported by arguments. There is no quotes from the text (if needed).
|
Some ideas on the questions. No good arguments.
|
some short answers. No arguments at all.
|
Overall appearance
|
Colours are used nicely. Different font or colours of the font are used. Well chosen pictures are added to illustrate the thought. Overall picture of the post gives a nice pleasant impression of well thought post.
|
Some variety in colours and/or font. Illustration/pictures are added (might not be totally supportive to the message.) Overall picture of the post is rather good.
|
No variety of colour, basic font, or the colours are really not appealing to the reader. if picture is added it is totally irrelevant to the context.
|
very plain post.
|
Comments
|
At least 2 comments are made. The student comments on the peers post and also gives his/her (authentic) insights or thoughts. May even propose a question for a further discussion.
|
At least 2 comments are made. The student comments on the peers post. May propose a short question for a further discussion.
|
The student comments on only one post. Gives his/her insights. May propose a questions for further discussion.
|
The student comments on only one post. Does not give his her thoughts/insights.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment