An excellent summary from which one can understand the main events, good insights, some personal ideas added.
Nice summary, main events mentioned, one or two personal thoughts. Yet, it is evident that the student has read the text.
The summary is very short, no personal insights. However the sentences written are to the point.
Gives only a couple of sentences of irrelevant information, not really about the chapters read.
Answering the questions
Student is able to give interesting information, well developed ideas and answers regarding the questions given, if needed is able to use the text to back himself/herself up.
Student has nice, original ideas while answering, however not all ideas are supported by arguments. There is no quotes from the text (if needed).
Some ideas on the questions. No good arguments.
some short answers. No arguments at all.
Colours are used nicely. Different font or colours of the font are used. Well chosen pictures are added to illustrate the thought. Overall picture of the post gives a nice pleasant impression of well thought post.
Some variety in colours and/or font. Illustration/pictures are added (might not be totally supportive to the message.) Overall picture of the post is rather good.
No variety of colour, basic font, or the colours are really not appealing to the reader. if picture is added it is totally irrelevant to the context.
very plain post.
At least 2 comments are made. The student comments on the peers post and also gives his/her (authentic) insights or thoughts. May even propose a question for a further discussion.
At least 2 comments are made. The student comments on the peers post. May propose a short question for a further discussion.
The student comments on only one post. Gives his/her insights. May propose a questions for further discussion.
The student comments on only one post. Does not give his her thoughts/insights.